Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.

493 U.S. 1040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 S. Ct. 321
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 16, 1990·No. No. 89-390·Published

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, [1041] p. 932.] Motion of Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied. Motion of respondents David H. Miller and William W. Shaffer for divided argument denied. Motion of respondent LTV Bank Group for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument denied. Motion of respondent Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Steel Co., Inc., and Certain Affiliates for divided argument denied. Motion of respondent Official Parent Creditors’ Committee of the LTV Corp. for divided argument denied. Motion of respondent BancTexas, Dallas, N. A., for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp., 493 U.S. 1040 (1990).

493 U.S. 1040 (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.