Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.

110 S. Ct. 833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 S. Ct. 321
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 16, 1990·No. No. 89-390·Published

Opinion

The motion of Bethlehem Steel Corporation, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae, for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument is denied. The motion of respondents David H. Miller and William W. Shaffer for divided argument is denied. The motion of respondent LTV Bank Group for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument is denied. The motion of respondent Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Steel Company, Inc. and Certain Affiliates for divided argument is denied. The motion of respondent Official Parent Creditors’ Committee of the LTV Corporation for divided argument is denied. The motion of respondent BancTexas, Dallas, N.A. for divided argument is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp., 110 S. Ct. 833 (U.S. 1990).

110 S. Ct. 833 (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.