Penrose v. Doody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Penrose v. Doody

254 A.D. 587, 4 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 587 (Penrose v. Doody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Penrose v. Doody, 254 A.D. 587, 4 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for the reforeclosuré of a mortgage on certain real property by the purchaser under the judgment of foreclosure and sale on a prior foreclosure where certain individuals, claiming a contingent interest in the fee of the property, had not been made parties in that prior foreclosure. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs; No Opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J.* Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for the reforeclosuré of a mortgage on certain real property by the purchaser under the judgment of foreclosure and sale on a prior foreclosure where certain individuals, claiming a contingent interest in the fee of the property, had not been made parties in that prior foreclosure. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs; No Opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J.* Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 587, 4 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penrose-v-doody-nyappdiv-1938.