Penrose v. Doody
This text of 246 A.D. 744 (Penrose v. Doody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Bessie Doody to compel plaintiff to accept payment of costs, taxes and interest, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale, and for a stay of the action, pursuant to section 1077-h of the Civil Practice Act, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penrose-v-doody-nyappdiv-1935.