Pennymac Corp. v. Godinez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pennymac Corp. v. Godinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Haw. 323
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 2020·No. SCWC-18-0000185·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 13-MAY-2020 12:35 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

PENNYMAC CORP., Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LEWANNA GODINEZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 13-1-0741(1)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Lewanna Godinez’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on March 11, 2020, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 13, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennymac Corp. v. Godinez, (haw 2020).

Pennymac Corp. v. Godinez (Pennymac Corp. v. Godinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.