Penny v. Kennedy

862 F.2d 567, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1706, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17662, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,508, 1988 WL 130656
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 3, 1988·No. No. 86-6280·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penny v. Kennedy, 862 F.2d 567, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1706, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17662, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,508, 1988 WL 130656 (6th Cir. 1988).

862 F.2d 567 (Penny v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related