48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,508, 3 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 1706 Roy Penny v. Thomas Kennedy, Commissioner of Fire and Police of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

862 F.2d 567
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 3, 1988·No. 86-6280·Published

Opinion

862 F.2d 567

48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,508,
3 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 1706
Roy PENNY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Thomas KENNEDY, Commissioner of Fire and Police of the City
of Chattanooga, Tennessee, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-6280.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 3, 1988.

Prior report: 6th Cir., 846 F.2d 1563.

ORDER

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,508, 3 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 1706 Roy Penny v. Thomas Kennedy, Commissioner of Fire and Police of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, 862 F.2d 567 (6th Cir. 1988).

862 F.2d 567 (48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,508, 3 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 1706 Roy Penny v. Thomas Kennedy, Commissioner of Fire and Police of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penny v. Kennedy
862 F.2d 567 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)