Penny Creaton v. Margaret Heckler
This text of 781 F.2d 1430 (Penny Creaton v. Margaret Heckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
Plaintiffs move to dismiss their interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction. We fail to see any circumstances “which demand, in the interests of justice, that this court deny appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss.” See Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc., 528 F.2d 675, 678 (9th Cir.1975). In dismissing the appeal, we simply accept plaintiffs’ decision to proceed to trial without interim relief from the district court. Therefore, the motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
781 F.2d 1430, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penny-creaton-v-margaret-heckler-ca9-1986.