Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.

179 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 F. 471
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 27, 1910·No. Nos. 2-9, 2-33, 2-149, 3-37·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It is quite manifest that the situation with regard to these federal taxes presents questions which should not be summarily disposed of. Indeed, it is possible that some of them can be satisfactorily disposed of only after the United States Supreme Court shall have decided the cases in which reargument has been ordered. The proper course would seem to bo for receivers to pay them, thus avoiding all possible penalties, and leaving the ultimate adjustments to be made hereafter. Such payment should be made, however, only under an order to the terms of which, in each case, the lessor company may agree, providing (as was done in the case of the franchise taxes) that the same shall be without prejudice to rights of lessee or bondholders, and that, in the event of its being finally decided that the lessor should pay these excise taxes, it will reimburse the receivers for the money now advanced to pay them. In cases where the lessors will not agree to the entry of such an order, the receivers should not take the responsibility of paying.

See, also, 176 Fed. 471.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co., 179 F. 1023, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5454 (circtsdny 1910).

179 F. 1023 (Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
176 F. 471 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1910)