Pennsylvania Bankers Association v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking

922 A.2d 876, 592 Pa. 14, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 925
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 2007·No. 40 MAL 2007 & 41 MAL 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*15 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April 2007, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

a. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in declaring 71 P.S. § 733-302 unconstitutional to the extent that it prohibits protestors from inspecting hearing files where the court failed to apply the proper standard of review and elevated the importance of a regulation (10 Pa.Code § 3.4) over that of the statute at issue.
b. Whether the plain language of the Credit Union Code and the Department of Banking Code demonstrates the General Assembly’s intent to exclude credit unions and their amendments of their field of membership from being subject to the mandatory hearing provision of 10 Pa.Code Chapter 3.

Further, upon consideration of the Expedited Application for Relief in the Nature of a Stay, filed by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, and the Application of Belco Community Credit Union and the Pennsylvania Credit Union Association for Stay, a STAY is GRANTED pending resolution of the appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Bankers Association v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking, 922 A.2d 876, 592 Pa. 14, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 925 (Pa. 2007).

922 A.2d 876 (Pennsylvania Bankers Association v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking
962 A.2d 609 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Weaver v. Harpster
922 A.2d 876 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)