Pennisi v. City of New York
422 N.E.2d 578, 53 N.Y.2d 779, 439 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2409
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate [781]*781Division abused its discretion in granting the motion to dismiss the action unconditionally as against defendant Realux Realty, Inc., pursuant to CPLR 3216.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pennisi v. City of New York, 422 N.E.2d 578, 53 N.Y.2d 779, 439 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2409 (N.Y. 1981).
422 N.E.2d 578 (Pennisi v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levin v. 40 Realty, Inc.
425 N.E.2d 891 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Central School District No. 1 v. Perfetto & Whalen Construction Corp.
425 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)