Central School District No. 1 v. Perfetto & Whalen Construction Corp.
425 N.E.2d 886, 53 N.Y.2d 1034, 442 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2561
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting the motions to dismiss the action as against defendants Urbahn, Reutershan, Koppers Company, Inc., and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company pursuant to CPLR 3216 (Pennisi v City of New York, 53 NY2d 779).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central School District No. 1 v. Perfetto & Whalen Construction Corp., 425 N.E.2d 886, 53 N.Y.2d 1034, 442 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2561 (N.Y. 1981).
425 N.E.2d 886 (Central School District No. 1 v. Perfetto & Whalen Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alaimo v. Government Employees Insurance
304 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Hirsch v. Hirsch
134 A.D.2d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Slocum v. Board of Education, Binghamton City School District
124 A.D.2d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Koriba, Inc. v. Porco
116 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Holdorf v. Oneonta Urban Renewal Agency
99 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)