Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia Oil & Gas L.P. v. Alfredo De La Garza, Individually and as Next Friend for I. D. L. G. and K. D. L. G., Minors, and John Paul Adame, Individually and A/N/F for C.A.A., J.P.A., Jr., and J.N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 2015·No. 01-15-00867-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-15-00867-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/12/2015 8:00:39 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

NO. 01-15-00867-CV

FILED IN FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/12/2015 8:00:39 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk

PENN VIRGINIA OIL & GAS GP, L.L.C. & PENN VIRGINIA OIL AND GAS, L.P., Appellants.

v.

ALFREDO DE LA GARZA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR XXXXXX XX XX XXXXX AND XXXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX, MINORS

&

JOHN PAUL ADAME, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX, AND XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX, MINORS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas Cause No. 2014-42519

APPELLEES' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES Appellee Alfredo De La Garza, individually and as next friend for

XXXXXX XX XX XXXXX AND XXXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX, minors, and files this

Appellees' Motion to Dismiss Appellants, Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia

Oil & Gas L.P. 's appeal, and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the following:

Introduction & Summary of Motion

1. Appellants are Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia Oil & Gas L.P. Appellees

are Alfredo De La Garza, individually and as next friend for XXXXXX XX XX XXXXX AND

XXXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX, minors.

2. Appellants filed their Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate on June 18, 2015. A copy of

that motion is attached as Exhibit "A". Appellees filed their response to appellants' Motion

to Compel Arbitration and to Abate on July 30, 2015. A copy of that response is attached as

Exhibit "B". On August 26, 2015, appellees filed their First Amended Response to appellants'

Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate. A copy of this amended response is attached as

"Exhibit "C". On September 10, 2015, appellants filed their reply to appellees' Response to

Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate. A copy of appellants' reply is attached as Exhibit

"D". On September 11, 2015, appellees filed their first supplement to their First Amended

Response to appellants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate. A copy of this

supplement is attached as Exhibit "E". The hearing on appellants' Motion to Compel

Arbitration and to Abate was initially set on July 31,2015, but was reset at appellees' request

for September 11,2015 with agreement of counsel for appellants. On September 11,2015, the

trial court heard appellants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate. Appellants' Motion

to Compel Arbitration and to Abate was denied by order dated September 11, 2015. See

Exhibit "F".

3. Appellants filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration

on October 1, 2015. A copy of this motion is attached as Exhibit "G". Appellees opposed

this motion and objected to the. affidavit of Ernest Nelson, attached to appellants' Motion for

Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration. A copy of appellees'

response is attached as Exhibit "H". On October 9, 2015, appellants filed their reply to

appellees' Response to Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Compel

Arbitration. A copy of appellants' reply is attached as Exhibit "1". The Hon. Elaine Palmer,

Judge of the 215th District Court denied appellants' Motion for Reconsideration of Order

Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration on October 12, 2015. A copy of the order is attached

as Exhibit "J".

4. Appellants filed their Notice of Appeal on October 13, 2015. A copy of this notice is attached

hereto as Exhibit "K". In appellants' Notice of Appeal, they seek to appeal the court's order

denying appellants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Abate signed on September 11, 2015.

Appellants also seek to appeal the order denying defendant's motion for reconsideration of the

order denying the motion to compel arbitration signed by Judge Palmer on October 12, 2015.

5. On October 14, 2015, appellants filed their Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of

Appeal.

6. The notice of appeal was untimely. The facts averred to by appellants' counsel fail to

reasonably explain the need for an extension.

7. The order denying appellants' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to

Compel Arbitration is not an appealable order.

Argument and Authorities

8. This is an accelerated appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. Perfecting the appeal is

completed by timely filing notice of appeal within 20 days pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 28.1(b)

and 26.1(b). Appellants' notice of appeal was filed 33 days after Judge Palmer's September

11, 2015 order was signed and is untimely. The notice should have been filed on October 1,

2015.

9. The facts alleged in appellants' motion and supported by appellants' affidavit attached to their

motion for extension of time do not reasonably explain the need for extension as required by

Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(l)(C).

10. The reply filed by appellants in response to Appellees' Response to Appellants' Motion for

Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal fails to address Thomas J. Smith's knowledge of

the deadline for filing the notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal. The verification of Kelly

C. Hartmann filed by appellants was not timely filed within fifteen days as required by Tex.

R. App. P. 26.3 and Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b).

11. Appellants also seek to appeal the October 12, 2015 order denying appellants' motion for

reconsideration of the trial court's order denying appellants' motion for arbitration and to

abate. This is a non-appealable order. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code§ 51.016. 9 U.S.C. § 16(a).

The motion for reconsideration also did not extend the appellate timetable. Hydro

Management Systems, LLC v. Jalin, Ltd., No. 04-09-00813-CV, 2010 WL 1817813 (Tex.

App.-San Antonio May 5, 2010, no pet. h.). See also Nabors Well Servs. Co. v. Aviles, No.

06-10-00018-CV, 2010 WL 2680087, at *1-2 (Tex. App. July 7, 2010, no pet. h.).

12. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code§ 51.016. provides that "[i]n a matter subject to the [FAA], a

person may take an appeal or writ of error to the court of appeals from the judgment or

interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, or county court under the same

circumstances that an appeal from a federal district court's order or decision would be permitted

by 9 U.S.C. Section 16." Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.§ 51.016.

13. Section 16(a) of the FAA, titled "Appeals," provides, in relevant part, as follows:

*2 (a) An appeal may be taken from(1)-

(1) an order-

(A) refusing a stay of any action under section 3 of this title,

(B) denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order arbitration to proceed,

(C) denying an application under section 206 of this title to compel arbitration,

(D) confirming or denying confirmation of an award or partial award, or

(E) modifying, correcting, or vacating an award.

9 U.S.C. § 16(a) (2015).

14. Lucchese Boot Co. v. Licon, 388 S.W.3d 365 (Tex. App. El Paso 2012, no pet. h.) is

distinguishable because it dealt with an amended motion to compel arbitration on an arbitration

agreement which had not previously been offered as a basis for its original motion to compel

arbitration. See also: Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. Castro, 374 S.W.3d 590 (Tex. App. El

Paso 2012, no pet. h.) (following Hydro Mgmt. Sys. LLC. and distinguishing Lucchese).

Prayer

Wherefore, premises considered, appellees, Alfredo De la Garza, XXXXXX XX XX

XXXXX and XXXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX, minors, pray that this Court dismiss appellants'

appeal for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), and for such other and further

relief to which they may be entitled, whether in law or in equity.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN DAVID HART State Bar No. 09147700

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN DAVID HART Wells Fargo Tower 201 Main Street, Suite 1720 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 (817) 870-2102 - phone (817) 332-5858 - facsimile j ohnhart@hartlaw. com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES, ALFREDO DE LA GARZA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR XXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX and XXXXXXXX XX XX XXXXX, MINORS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia Oil & Gas L.P. v. Alfredo De La Garza, Individually and as Next Friend for I. D. L. G. and K. D. L. G., Minors, and John Paul Adame, Individually and A/N/F for C.A.A., J.P.A., Jr., and J.N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia Oil & Gas L.P. v. Alfredo De La Garza, Individually and as Next Friend for I. D. L. G. and K. D. L. G., Minors, and John Paul Adame, Individually and A/N/F for C.A.A., J.P.A., Jr., and J.N.A. (Penn Virginia Oil & Gas GP, LLC and Penn Virginia Oil & Gas L.P. v. Alfredo De La Garza, Individually and as Next Friend for I. D. L. G. and K. D. L. G., Minors, and John Paul Adame, Individually and A/N/F for C.A.A., J.P.A., Jr., and J.N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Webster
128 S.W.3d 223 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)
In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.
196 S.W.3d 774 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
In Re Bank One, N.A.
216 S.W.3d 825 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
Perry Homes v. Cull
258 S.W.3d 580 (Texas Supreme Court, 2008)
In Re Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.
258 S.W.3d 623 (Texas Supreme Court, 2008)
In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.
293 S.W.3d 182 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. Reitz
403 S.W.3d 840 (Texas Supreme Court, 2013)
Wee Tots Pediatrics, P.A. v. Morohunfola
268 S.W.3d 784 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Reagan v. Vaughn
804 S.W.2d 463 (Texas Supreme Court, 1991)
In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.
987 S.W.2d 571 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
NABORS DRILLING USA, LP v. Carpenter
198 S.W.3d 240 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.
52 S.W.3d 749 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
In Re Halliburton Co.
80 S.W.3d 566 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)
In Re SSP Partners
241 S.W.3d 162 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
76 S.W.3d 555 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Pepe International Development Co. v. Pub Brewing Co.
915 S.W.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC v. Joan McCray
416 S.W.3d 168 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)