Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Schmoke

520 U.S. 1204, 137 L. Ed. 2d 715, 117 S. Ct. 1569, 65 U.S.L.W. 3727, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2792

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 1997·No. No. 96-1429·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Schmoke, 520 U.S. 1204, 137 L. Ed. 2d 715, 117 S. Ct. 1569, 65 U.S.L.W. 3727, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2792 (1997).

Pincite

520 U.S. 1204 (Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Schmoke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly

84 F. Supp. 2d 180 (D. Massachusetts, 2000)

Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc. v. City of Chicago

189 F.3d 633 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)

Rockwood v. City of Burlington, VT.

21 F. Supp. 2d 411 (D. Vermont, 1998)

Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

8 F. Supp. 2d 1225 (W.D. Washington, 1998)

Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and Lorillard Tobacco Company v. L. Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and David H. Mulligan, Massachusetts Commissioner of Public Health, United States Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Conwood Company, L.P., National Tobacco Company, L.P., the Pinkerton Tobacco Company, and Swisher International, Inc. v. L. Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and David H. Mulligan, Massachusetts Commissioner of Public Health

122 F.3d 58 (First Circuit, 1997)

Philip Morris Inc. v. Harshbarger

122 F.3d 58 (First Circuit, 1997)