Penman v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
510 N.E.2d 803, 69 N.Y.2d 989, 517 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16797
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. As we stated in Matter of Pan Am. World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd. (61 NY2d 542), the Statute of Limitations is tolled during the pendency of a complaint with the Division of Human Rights *991 pursuant to CPLR 204 (a) and thus the action is not time barred.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penman v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 510 N.E.2d 803, 69 N.Y.2d 989, 517 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16797 (N.Y. 1987).
510 N.E.2d 803 (Penman v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Middletown City School District
S.D. New York, 2024
Banks v. General Motors, LLC
W.D. New York, 2020
Moll v. Telesector Resources Group, Inc.
W.D. New York, 2020
NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS v. FOLINO, ANTHONY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
New York State Division of Human Rights v. Folino
140 A.D.3d 1730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Sloth v. Constellation Brands, Inc.
924 F. Supp. 2d 461 (W.D. New York, 2013)
Sundaram v. Brookhaven National Laboratories
424 F. Supp. 2d 545 (E.D. New York, 2006)
Wilson v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
195 F. Supp. 2d 419 (W.D. New York, 2002)
Martinez-Tolentino v. Buffalo State College
277 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)