Pendleton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pendleton v. State

36 S.W.2d 1118, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 817

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pendleton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Tex. Crim. 595 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 1931·No. No. 14251·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is attempt to commit burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. No fundamental error has been pointed out or perceived.

The appellant, Whitey Hays, has filed his sworn request to withdraw his appeal. As to him the appeal is dismissed, and as to Asa Pendleton, alias Harry Ward, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is attempt to commit burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. No fundamental error has been pointed out or perceived.

The appellant, Whitey Hays, has filed his sworn request to withdraw his appeal. As to him the appeal is dismissed, and as to Asa Pendleton, alias Harry Ward, the judgment is affirmed.

Pendleton v. State, 36 S.W.2d 1118, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 817 (Tex. 1931).

Pincite

36 S.W.2d 1118 (Pendleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.