Peggy Hopkins v. Kilolo Kijakazi

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: October 18, 2023
• Docket: 23-1921
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-1921 ___________________________

Peggy Hopkins

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: October 13, 2023 Filed: October 18, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Peggy Hopkins appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We agree with the court that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the adverse decision. See Kraus v. Saul, 988 F.3d 1019, 1023-24 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review). We find no merit to Hopkins’s argument that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by failing to include any limitations related to her severe impairment of diverticulitis in the residual functional capacity (RFC) finding, as the ALJ considered this impairment in determining that she was limited to performing medium work with additional restrictions. See Chismarich v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 978, 980 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (while consistency is required between severity and RFC findings, these steps serve distinct purposes, and this court’s deferential review precludes labeling findings inconsistent if they can be harmonized; court may not pick nits nor accept appellant’s invitation to rely upon perceived inconsistencies). We also find that the ALJ properly declined to include an RFC limitation requiring frequent bathroom breaks, as he found Hopkins’s testimony on that point was unsupported by the medical evidence. See Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004, 1012 (8th Cir. 2019) (ALJ properly discounted claimant’s testimony regarding medication side effects, as medical records did not support that claim); Julin v. Colvin, 826 F.3d 1082, 1089 (8th Cir. 2016) (ALJ permissibly excluded greater limitations from RFC after determining that record was not consistent with degree of symptoms alleged).

The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-