Pefaur v. Pefaur
768 So. 2d 1097, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12746, 1995 WL 736270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pefaur v. Pefaur. Read the opinion of the Court — 617 So. 2d 425 →
Opinion
ON MOTION TO REVIEW
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it required appellant to post a $400,000 bond to stay the orders under review on this appeal. In so doing, however, we hasten to add that we have not assessed the merits of this appeal at this time.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pefaur v. Pefaur, 768 So. 2d 1097, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12746, 1995 WL 736270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
768 So. 2d 1097 (Pefaur v. Pefaur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.