Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence

Supreme Court of Alabama

Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence

157 So. 79, 229 Ala. 351

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 4, 1934

Docket8 Div. 607.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 157 So. 79 (Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence, 157 So. 79, 229 Ala. 351 (Ala. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The petitioner was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Florence for violating a municipal ordinance, and appealed to the law and equity court of Florence, where his appeal was dismissed on motion of the city, and from that judgment he appealed to ;the *352 Court of Appeals and submitted bis case without assignment of errors on the record, where the judgment was affirmed. Pie then applied for a rehearing and his application was stricken.

The law is well settled that an assignment of errors is essential to properly present questions on such appeals. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 So. 1035; Craig v. City of Birmingham, 14 Ala. App. 630, 71 So. 983; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571. The affirmance of the judgment of the law and equity court hy the Court of Appeals was, therefore, free from error, and the writ of certiorari is due to he denied and the petition dismissed.

Writ denied; petition dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. X, and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, Justice.

The petitioner was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Florence for violating a municipal ordinance, and appealed to the law and equity court of Florence, where his appeal was dismissed on motion of the city, and from that judgment he appealed to ;the *352 Court of Appeals and submitted bis case without assignment of errors on the record, where the judgment was affirmed. Pie then applied for a rehearing and his application was stricken.

The law is well settled that an assignment of errors is essential to properly present questions on such appeals. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 So. 1035; Craig v. City of Birmingham, 14 Ala. App. 630, 71 So. 983; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571. The affirmance of the judgment of the law and equity court hy the Court of Appeals was, therefore, free from error, and the writ of certiorari is due to he denied and the petition dismissed.

Writ denied; petition dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. X, and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 79, 229 Ala. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peever-v-city-comrs-of-florence-ala-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack