Craig v. City of Birmingham

71 So. 983, 14 Ala. App. 630, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 77
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1916·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

EVANS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance. The appellant assigns no error upon the record.

The prosecution for a violation of a municipal ordinance is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. Section 6264, Code 1907, obviating the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to quasi criminal appeals, as for the violation of an ordinance of a municipal corporation.—Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035; Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery, 4 Ala. App. 270, 58 South. 730; Creel v. City of Jasper, 69 South. 239.

Appellee’s motion to affirm, it follows, is well taken, and the judgment of the court below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. City of Birmingham, 71 So. 983, 14 Ala. App. 630, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 77 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

71 So. 983 (Craig v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. City of Montgomery
92 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)
Stinson v. City of Birmingham
20 So. 2d 113 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1944)
Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence
157 So. 79 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Russell v. City of Bessemer
99 So. 53 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Johnson v. City of Tuscaloosa
96 So. 941 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
MacOn v. City of Anniston
92 So. 913 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Houlton v. City of Montgomery
81 So. 164 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)