Craig v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Craig v. City of Birmingham

71 So. 983, 14 Ala. App. 630, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 77

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 30, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 71 So. 983 (Craig v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. City of Birmingham, 71 So. 983, 14 Ala. App. 630, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 77 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

EVANS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a municipal ordinance. The appellant assigns no error upon the record.

The prosecution for a violation of a municipal ordinance is statutory and quasi criminal in its nature. Section 6264, Code 1907, obviating the necessity of assigning errors in criminal cases, has no application to quasi criminal appeals, as for the violation of an ordinance of a municipal corporation.—Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253, 55 South. 1035; Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery, 4 Ala. App. 270, 58 South. 730; Creel v. City of Jasper, 69 South. 239.

Appellee’s motion to affirm, it follows, is well taken, and the judgment of the court below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI