Peet v. Dupont Securities Group, Inc.

260 S.W.3d 433, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2008 WL 3843345
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2008·No. ED 90212·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dupont Securities Group, Inc. and Marquis Financial Services of Indiana, Inc., d/b/a Marquis Financial Services, Inc. (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying Appellant’s motion to set aside a default judgment. Appellant raises four points on appeal, challenging the validity of the trial court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peet v. Dupont Securities Group, Inc., 260 S.W.3d 433, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2008 WL 3843345 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

260 S.W.3d 433 (Peet v. Dupont Securities Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peet v. DUPONT SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
301 S.W.3d 526 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
McCord v. State
260 S.W.3d 433 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)