McCord v. State

260 S.W.3d 433, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1094, 2008 WL 3843537
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2008·No. ED 90061·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonard McCord (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCord v. State, 260 S.W.3d 433, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1094, 2008 WL 3843537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

260 S.W.3d 433 (McCord v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peet v. Dupont Securities Group, Inc.
260 S.W.3d 433 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)