Peele v. . Powell
76 S.E. 632, 161 N.C. 50, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 368
Opinion
This is a petition to rehear. There is no division in the Court as to the propositions of law laid down on the former hearing; but upon a fuller consideration of the facts, the majority of the Court are now of opinion that there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to a jury.
Petition allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peele v. . Powell, 76 S.E. 632, 161 N.C. 50, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 368 (N.C. 1912).
76 S.E. 632 (Peele v. . Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Foil
202 S.E.2d 591 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Baker v. MALAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
121 S.E.2d 731 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Warren v. White
112 S.E.2d 522 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Pegram-West, Inc. v. Winston Mutual Life Insurance
56 S.E.2d 607 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Farmers Federation, Inc. v. . Morris
27 S.E.2d 80 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Cotton Co. v. . Henrietta Mills
13 S.E.2d 557 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Forest City Cotton Co. v. Henrietta Mills
219 N.C. 279 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Brown v. . Benton
183 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Dozier v. . Wood
181 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)