Peebles v. Owners Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Peebles v. Owners Insurance

781 N.E.2d 218, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 2002

DocketNo. 2002-0788

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 N.E.2d 218 (Peebles v. Owners Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peebles v. Owners Insurance, 781 N.E.2d 218, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

781 N.E.2d 218, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-owners-insurance-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack