Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.

2002 Ohio 7022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 2002

Docket2002-0788

StatusPublished

This text of 2002 Ohio 7022 (Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 2002 Ohio 7022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.]

PEEBLES, EXR., APPELLANT, v. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.] Insurance — Motor vehicles — Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage — Homeowner’s insurance policy — Residence-employee exception — Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 2002-0788 — Submitted December 4, 2002 — Decided December 23, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fulton County, No. F-01-022, 2002-Ohio- 1518. __________________ {¶1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.]

PEEBLES, EXR., APPELLANT, v. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.] Insurance — Motor vehicles — Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage — Homeowner’s insurance policy — Residence-employee exception — Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 2002-0788 — Submitted December 4, 2002 — Decided December 23, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fulton County, No. F-01-022, 2002-Ohio- 1518. __________________ {¶1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 7022, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peebles-v-owners-ins-co-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack