Pedro Menendez v. Aetna Insurance Company

311 F.2d 437
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 1962
Docket19139
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 311 F.2d 437 (Pedro Menendez v. Aetna Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pedro Menendez v. Aetna Insurance Company, 311 F.2d 437 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We conclude from a careful review of the entire record that the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint must „ be reversed for the reasons stated in our opinion of this date in the case of Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company and (Vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance Company) 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429.

The residual questions of law in this case not specifically dealt with in our opinion above are more properly determinable by the District Court upon full hearing on the merits.

This cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion in the Rodriguez case.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F.2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pedro-menendez-v-aetna-insurance-company-ca5-1962.