Peck (Frank) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 2015·No. 68825·Unpublished

Opinion

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FRANK MILFORD PECK, No. 68825 Petitioner,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, F E L E

7 Resgendent. q” OCT i § 2315

TRAle Pf. LFNDEMAN CLEFM CF SaJPQEifiE COURT

3v 3-

ORDER DENYING PETITION afieu‘rtfizem

This is a pro se petition for a writ 0f prohibition. Petitioner

asserts that the district ceurt has mishandled filings in the district ceurt. We have reviewed the dncumente submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits ef any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NBS 34.320; NRS 34.380.

‘ Accordingly, we ORDER. the petition DENIED.

I?

, J, Pickering

cc: Frank Milferd Peck Attorney General/C arsen City Waehoe County District Attorney Waehoe District Court Clerk

51:91am: Gaum' OF NEVADA

i’ “A “W 52313557 ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peck (Frank) v. State, (Neb. 2015).

Peck (Frank) v. State (Peck (Frank) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 34.380
Nevada § 34.380