Peck (Frank) v. State
This text of Peck (Frank) v. State (Peck (Frank) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
person supplemental petition. The district court subsequently allowed
counsel to withdraw and appellant then filed seven more supplemental
petitions. After appellant filed his last supplemental petition on
December 5, 2013, the district court ordered the State to respond. The
State filed a motion to dismiss the petition and supplements on the
grounds that the petition was prematurely filed, the supplements were
untimely filed and were fugitive pleadings, and appellant's claims were
without merit or were procedurally barred. The district court granted the
State's motion and dismissed appellant's petition.
We conclude that the district court erred in dismissing
appellant's petition. The district court did not address any of the claims
raised in the June 18, 2009, petition. Rather, the district court appeared
to find that the petition was prematurely filed and that the supplemental
petition filed on October 9, 2012, was untimely because it was filed more
than one year after the issuance of remittitur on direct appeal. Although
the June 18, 2009, petition was filed before entry of the judgment of
conviction on July 10, 2009, we conclude that this was not a proper basis
for denying the petition almost five years later, especially when the
district court proceeded with the petition following entry of the judgment
by appointing counsel and characterizing the proceedings as "post-
conviction." Therefore, we reverse with instructions for the district court
to consider the June 18, 2009, petition. At that time, the district court
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A se may also consider whether the supplemental petitions may be filed
pursuant to NRS 34.750(5). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with
this order.
, J. Hardesty
et ir7/‘ J. Douglas
J.
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A' e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Peck (Frank) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-frank-v-state-nev-2014.