Pease v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 137 A.D. 929 (Pease v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Robson, J., who dissented upon the ground that the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence should be granted. (See opinion by Williams, J., on decision of appeal from order denying motion for hew trial upon ground of newly-discovered evidence in same case, decided at this term of court, ante, p. 458.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappdiv-1910.