Pearson v. Simms

Fourth Circuit

Pearson v. Simms

88 F. App'x 639

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2004·No. 04-6018·Unpublished·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *640 soning of the district court. See Pearson v. Simms, No. CA-02-3647-8-RDB (D. Md. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *640 soning of the district court. See Pearson v. Simms, No. CA-02-3647-8-RDB (D. Md. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pearson v. Simms, 88 F. App'x 639 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

88 F. App'x 639 (Pearson v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related