Pearson v. Pearson
54 S.E. 194, 125 Ga. 132, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 75
Opinion
The evidence being conflicting as to whether the plaintiff leí her husband’s home and lived apart from him because of cruel treatment, or voluntarily quitted him in unprovoked anger, without excuse and because she did not wish to live longer with him, the court below did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant her prayer for temporary alimony for the support of herself and child, together with counsel fees. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. Pearson, 54 S.E. 194, 125 Ga. 132, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 75 (Ga. 1906).
54 S.E. 194 (Pearson v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. Cook
30 S.E.2d 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Roberts v. Roberts
10 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Bulloch v. Bulloch
4 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Fulenwider v. Fulenwider
5 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Tillman v. Tillman
1 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Grant v. Grant
191 S.E. 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Montgomery v. Montgomery
177 S.E. 337 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Floyd v. Floyd
108 So. 896 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Long v. Long
95 S.E. 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
George v. George
61 S.E. 401 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Parks v. Parks
55 S.E. 176 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)