George v. George
61 S.E. 401, 130 Ga. 608, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 367
Opinion
The evidence being conflicting as to whether the plaintiff left her husband’s home and lived apart from him because of cruel treatment, or voluntarily quitted him in unprovoked anger, without excuse and because she did not wish to live longer with him, the court below did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant her prayer for temporary alimony, together with counsel fees. Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ga. 132 (54 S. E. 194). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. George, 61 S.E. 401, 130 Ga. 608, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 367 (Ga. 1908).
61 S.E. 401 (George v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tilly v. Tilly
152 S.E.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Joyner v. Joyner
29 S.E.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Roberts v. Roberts
10 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Tillman v. Tillman
1 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Floyd v. Floyd
108 So. 896 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Rorie v. Rorie
67 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)