Pearson, Durk v. FDA

172 F.3d 72, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 254, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954, 1999 WL 178712
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 2, 1999·No. 98-5043, 98-5084·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Upon consideration of appellees’ suggestion for rehearing en banc, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is

ORDERED that the suggestion be denied.

A statement by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearson, Durk v. FDA, 172 F.3d 72, 335 U.S. App. D.C. 254, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954, 1999 WL 178712 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

172 F.3d 72 (Pearson, Durk v. FDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pearson, Durk v. FDA
172 F.3d 72 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)