Pearsall v. State

570 So. 2d 254, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1599, 1990 WL 187115
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pearsall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 793
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 21, 1990·No. 5 Div. 540·Published

Opinion

[255]*255ON RETURN TO REMAND

PATTERSON, Judge.

Pursuant to instructions from the Supreme Court of Alabama, we remanded this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the circumstances surrounding Anthony Pearsall’s termination from his work release job and the reasons for the disciplinary board’s failure to honor his request to have a certain witness present at his disciplinary hearing.

Due return to our remand has been filed by the trial court. The return shows that the trial court, after considering the pleadings filed in the case and the opinions of the Alabama Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals, granted Pearsall’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court ordered the Department of Corrections to expunge from Pearsall’s file all reference to the disciplinary proceedings described in the petition and to restore all good time taken from Pearsall as a result of the proceedings. The action of the trial court granting the relief prayed for by Pearsall renders his appeal moot, and it is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearsall v. State, 570 So. 2d 254, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1599, 1990 WL 187115 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

570 So. 2d 254 (Pearsall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.