Pearsall v. State

564 So. 2d 1018, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 916, 1990 WL 120508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pearsall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 793
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 29, 1990·No. 5 Div. 540·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

On May 11, 1990, the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed this court’s judgment in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case to us with instructions. 564 So.2d 1017. The Supreme Court affirmed this court’s ruling reversing the trial court’s judgment dismissing appellant’s petition; however, it reversed this court’s order directing that the trial court issue a writ of habeas corpus and ordering that all references to the disciplinary proceeding be expunged from the record. The Supreme Court ordered that we remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the circumstances surrounding termination of the petitioner from his work release job and the reasons for the disciplinary board’s failure to honor his request to require the presence of witness Alfred Smith at his disciplinary hearing.

Due return should be made of the proceedings conducted below.

[1019]*1019AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearsall v. State, 564 So. 2d 1018, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 916, 1990 WL 120508 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 1018 (Pearsall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pearsall v. State
564 So. 2d 1017 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)