Pearl Asset Management LLC v. Bretz Group

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 18, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-10687·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PEARL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, Plaintiff, 23-CV-10687 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BRETZ GROUP, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Pearl Asset Management LLC filed this action pro se, did not indicate that it was represented by an attorney, and did not pay the $405.00 in fees to bring this action. By order dated December 12, 2023, the Court informed Plaintiff that the matter would be dismissed without prejudice unless, within 30 days from the date of that order, an attorney representing Plaintiff filed a notice of appearance on its behalf, and paid the fees. An attorney has not filed a notice of appearance on Plaintiff’s behalf, and the fees have not been paid. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearl Asset Management LLC v. Bretz Group, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Pearl Asset Management LLC v. Bretz Group (Pearl Asset Management LLC v. Bretz Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)