Pearce v. Pearce

31 So. 85, 132 Ala. 221, 1901 Ala. LEXIS 194
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 20, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SHARPE, J.-

— What in briefs for appellant is conceded to be the only question necessary to be passed on in this appeal has been settled adversely to appellant by decisions of this court Avhich maintain that equity [222]*222will in a proper case enforce in favor of tlie wife a claim for her support out of the estate of her husband without and independently of proceedings for a divorce. See cases cited in brief for appellee, viz.: Murray v. Murray, 84 Ala. 363; Hinds v. Hinds, 80 Ala. 225; Wray v. Wray, 33 Ala. 187; Mims v. Mims, 33 Ala. 98; Glover v. Glover, 16 Ala. 440. We adhere to those decisions and affirm the chancery court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearce v. Pearce, 31 So. 85, 132 Ala. 221, 1901 Ala. LEXIS 194 (Ala. 1901).

31 So. 85 (Pearce v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donigan v. Donigan
53 N.W.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
Rumping v. Rumping
12 L.R.A.N.S. 1197 (Montana Supreme Court, 1907)