Pearce v. Pearce
This text of 31 So. 85 (Pearce v. Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— What in briefs for appellant is conceded to be the only question necessary to be passed on in this appeal has been settled adversely to appellant by decisions of this court Avhich maintain that equity [222]*222will in a proper case enforce in favor of tlie wife a claim for her support out of the estate of her husband without and independently of proceedings for a divorce. See cases cited in brief for appellee, viz.: Murray v. Murray, 84 Ala. 363; Hinds v. Hinds, 80 Ala. 225; Wray v. Wray, 33 Ala. 187; Mims v. Mims, 33 Ala. 98; Glover v. Glover, 16 Ala. 440. We adhere to those decisions and affirm the chancery court’s decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 So. 85, 132 Ala. 221, 1901 Ala. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-pearce-ala-1901.