Pearce v. Pearce

136 Ala. 188
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 136 Ala. 188 (Pearce v. Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearce v. Pearce, 136 Ala. 188 (Ala. 1902).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

A petition by the wife under section 2538 of the Code is properly filed in her own name. McGough v. McGough, ante, p. 170.

A plea of res adjudicate, was filed in the petition, setting up the filing of a former petition by this petitioner, and that on a demurrer sustained to the petition, and a failure of the petitioner to amend the said petition, the same was by decree of the court dismissed. In proceedings of this nature, involving the custody and 'care of infants, the paramount consideration is the well-being and good of the infant. The rights of the petitioner and the defendant in the petition are secondary in consideration. The infant is regarded as the ward of a court of chancery, and that court will not permit his well-being to be jeopardized by any judgment in a previous contest between the father and mother concerning his custody^and care. The.court may by its decrees change its custody from one. parent to the other, as the interest and care of the infant may in the judgment of the court require. The. character and purpose of the proceedings here are different from an action where only the. rights of the parties litigating are involved. The demurrer to the plea was properly sustained.

Those, are the only questions presented for consideration, and the ruling of the lower court being, in harmony with our views, the decree will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K.U. v. J.C.
196 So. 3d 265 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2015)
Gallant v. Gallant
184 So. 3d 387 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2014)
JC v. State Department of Human Resources
986 So. 2d 1172 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Easterling v. Caton
71 So. 2d 835 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Scott v. Scott
25 So. 2d 673 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Rosa v. Underwood
179 So. 530 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Fletcher v. Preston
148 So. 137 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Porter v. Porter
112 So. 646 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Sparkman v. Sparkman
114 So. 580 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Worthington v. Worthington
111 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Steele v. Crute
93 So. 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Ex Parte Rickerson
82 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
McDaniel v. Youngblood
77 So. 674 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Burns v. Shapley
77 So. 447 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Coleman v. Coleman
73 So. 473 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Murphree v. Hanson
72 So. 433 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Hayes v. Hayes
68 So. 351 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Montgomery v. Hughes
58 So. 113 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 Ala. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-pearce-ala-1902.