Pearce v. Glass

683 P.2d 569, 69 Or. App. 14, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3806
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 5, 1984
Docket8689; CA A29743
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 683 P.2d 569 (Pearce v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearce v. Glass, 683 P.2d 569, 69 Or. App. 14, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3806 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this case, a summary judgment was entered against plaintiff John Pearce, dba Quicksilver Construction Company, but not against plaintiff Wesley Moore. Because the trial court did not make a specific determination under ORCP 67B “that there [was] no just reason for delay” in entering judgment, or expressly direct that judgment be entered against less than all parties, this appeal must be dismissed. ORCP 67B; Bonner v. Krause, 69 Or App 1, 684 P2d 10 (1984); May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, 64 Or App 672, 669 P2d 824 (1983).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearce v. Glass
692 P.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 P.2d 569, 69 Or. App. 14, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearce-v-glass-orctapp-1984.