Peachtree Plastics, Inc. v. Verhine

528 S.E.2d 837, 242 Ga. App. 21, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 613, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 84
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 2000
DocketA99A1826
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 528 S.E.2d 837 (Peachtree Plastics, Inc. v. Verhine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peachtree Plastics, Inc. v. Verhine, 528 S.E.2d 837, 242 Ga. App. 21, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 613, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Lester Verhine d/b/a Plastic Grinders of Georgia, Inc. (Verhine) sued Peachtree Plastics, Inc. (Peachtree) to collect an unpaid account. Verhine filed a motion to strike Peachtree’s answer and for a default judgment alleging that the answer was a nullity because it was filed by Peachtree’s president, a nonattorney who was not authorized to represent the corporation in a court of record. Peachtree responded to *22 the motion by filing an amended answer filed by an attorney who entered an appearance as Peachtree’s attorney of record. The trial court struck Peachtree’s answer and granted a default judgment in favor of Verhine. Peachtree appeals claiming that its amended answer filed by an attorney was a valid answer which related back to the date of the original answer under the provisions of OCGA § 9-11-15.

Decided January 21, 2000. Carlisle & Carlisle, William R. Carlisle, for appellant. John B. Begonia, Jr., for appellee.

We agree. Since Peachtree is a corporation and can be represented in a court of record only by an attorney, the answer filed by its nonattorney president was defective. Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, 267 Ga. 801, 803-806 (485 SE2d 22) (1997). This was an amendable defect, however, which was cured pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-15 when, prior to entry of a pretrial order, an attorney representing Peachtree filed an amended answer, which related back to the date of the original answer. Bandy v. Hosp. Auth. of Walker County, 174 Ga. App. 556 (332 SE2d 46) (1985); McCormick v. Acree, 232 Ga. App. 834 (503 SE2d 88) (1998) (physical precedent); North Ga. Med. Center v. Food Lion, 238 Ga. App. 78 (517 SE2d 799) (1999). The trial court erred by striking the amended answer and granting a default judgment in favor of Verhine.

Judgment reversed.

Ruffin and Ellington, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DAL MOTORS, INC. v. JULIZA OROSCO
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024
Alexander & Baldwin , LLC v. Armitage.
508 P.3d 832 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2022)
Brougham Casket & Vault Co. v. DeLoach
747 S.E.2d 707 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Oxmoor Portfolio, LLC v. Flooring & Tile Superstore of Conyers, Inc.
740 S.E.2d 363 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Murray v. DeKALB FARMERS MARKET, INC.
699 S.E.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Smyrna Development Co. v. Whitener Ltd. Partnership
635 S.E.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Rainier Holdings, Inc. v. Tatum
622 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Davenport v. Lee
40 S.W.3d 346 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2001)
Temp-N-Around Medical Resources, Inc. v. Venture
546 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Janet Ricker Builder, Inc. v. Gardner
536 S.E.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 S.E.2d 837, 242 Ga. App. 21, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 613, 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peachtree-plastics-inc-v-verhine-gactapp-2000.