Peachtree North Apartments Company v. Huffman-Wolfe Company

191 S.E.2d 485, 126 Ga. App. 594, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1226
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1972
Docket47091, 47092, 47093, 47094
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 191 S.E.2d 485 (Peachtree North Apartments Company v. Huffman-Wolfe Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peachtree North Apartments Company v. Huffman-Wolfe Company, 191 S.E.2d 485, 126 Ga. App. 594, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The question for decision is whether two independent contractors who had completed and turned their work over to the owner would be liable to plaintiff who fell in a parking lot because she stepped in a hole which varied from two to five inches in depth and from two to five feet in length and width.

"It is a well established general rule that, where the work of an independent contractor is completed, turned over to, and accepted by the owner, the contractor is not liable to third persons for damages or injuries subsequently suffered by reason of the condition of the work, even . though he was negligent in carrying out the contract, at least, if the defect is not hidden but readily observable on reasonable inspection. 65 CJS 613, § 95; Young v. Smith & Kelly Co., 124 Ga. 475 (52 SE 765, 110 ASR 186, 4 AC 226), and citations. There are, of course, well recognized exceptions to this general rule. One such exception is that the contractor is liable where the work is a nuisance per se, or inherently or intrinsically dangerous. Another is that the contractor is liable where the work done and turned over by him is so negligently defective as to be imminently dangerous to third persons. 65 CJS 614, § 95; Higgins v. Otis Elevator Co., 69 Ga. App. 584 (26 SE2d 380).” (Emphasis supplied.) Queen v. *595 Craven, 95 Ga. App. 178, 183 (97 SE2d 523).

Argued April 10, 1972— Decided June 9, 1972— Rehearing denied July 6, 1972. Neely, Freeman & Hawkins, Paul M. Hawkins, A. Timothy Jones, Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Palmer H. Ansley, for Peachtree North. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Edward E. Dorsey, Stuart E. Eizenstat, Arnall, Golden & Gregory, H. Fred Gober, for Huffman-Wolfe. Huie & Harland, Harry L. Cashin, Jr., Joe G. Davis, Jr., for Morse.

The first exception is applicable only where the work performed is itself inherently dangerous. Community Gas Co. v. Williams, 87 Ga. App. 68, 78 (73 SE2d 119); Ridgeway v. Downing Co., 109 Ga. 591, 595 (34 SE 1028); Robbins Home Improvement Co. v. Guthrie, 213 Ga. 138, 140 (97 SE2d 153).

The plaintiff contends that the hole in the parking lot comes within the second exception. However, the evidence sho’ws that at the time the work was completed the surface of the parking lot was level and the depression only developed after automobiles had been driven over that area for some length of time. Therefore, the construction was not imminently dangerous at the time it was turned over by the independent contractors. The granting of the summary judgments in favor of the two independent contractors, appellees here, was not error.

Judgments affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SCHREIBER v. KEY
M.D. Georgia, 2025
Angela Marie Stopanio v. Leon's Fence and Guardrail, LLC
815 S.E.2d 232 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)
Hollis & Spann, Inc. v. Hopkins
686 S.E.2d 817 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Clive v. Gregory
635 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Cieplinski v. Caldwell Electrical Contractors, Inc.
633 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Ogles v. EA Mann & Co., Inc.
625 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Bell South Telecommunications, Inc. v. Widner
495 S.E.2d 52 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Carney v. JDN Construction Co.
426 S.E.2d 611 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Savage v. Flagler Co.
364 S.E.2d 52 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Powell v. Ledbetter Bros.
307 S.E.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Hawkins v. Turner
303 S.E.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
St. Paul Companies v. CAPITOL OFFICE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.
282 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Wilner's, Inc. v. Fine
266 S.E.2d 278 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 S.E.2d 485, 126 Ga. App. 594, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peachtree-north-apartments-company-v-huffman-wolfe-company-gactapp-1972.