(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 26, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00699·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | GOULD, 1:24-cv-00699-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 11 V. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 12 | COUNTY OF FRESNO, (Doc. No. 5) 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 | § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 18 | are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 19 | Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000) 20 In the instant action, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 2] | Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. 22 | Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Af 55 | Dated: _ June 26, 2024 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno ((PC)Gould v. County of Fresno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)