(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 17, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00699·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 DAVID GOULD, 1:24-cv-00699-SAB (PC) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT A 7 v. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 8 COUNTY OF FRESNO, OR PAY THE $405.00 FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 9 Defendant. 10 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

D § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 13 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

4 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). Plaintiff has not paid the $405.00 filing fee, 15 or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28

16 US.C. § 1915. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff the attached form for application to proceed 18 in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner; 19 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit the

20 completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the

> alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will

result in dismissal of this action.

23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: _ June 17, 2024 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC)Gould v. County of Fresno ((PC)Gould v. County of Fresno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)