(PC) Wilson v. Castro

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 7, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00542·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERALD JAY WILSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00542-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND 13 v. DIRECTING CLERK TO PROVIDE COURTESY COPY OF COMPLAINT 14 J. CASTRO, (Doc. No. 17) 15 Defendant.

16 JULY 8, 2024 DEADLINE 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Plaintiff’s Declaration in Support 19 of Reconsideration Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) As to the Court’s 20 Order to Striking [sic] Improper Pleading.” (Doc. No. 17). The Court construes the pleading as a 21 motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the 22 motion. 23 On May 9, 2024, the Court struck Plaintiff’s Complaint because it failed to comply with 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (See Doc. No. 16). On May 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed the 25 instant Motion, disputing that his Complaint contained more than 50 pages and is the Complaint 26 that he filed in the Northern District of California that was transferred to this Court. Plaintiff 27 seeks reconsideration of the Court’s order striking the Complaint and requests a copy of the 28 Complaint to verify that it was the same Complaint he filed in the Northern District. (See Doc. 1 No. 17). 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) provides relief from a final judgment, order, or 3 proceeding for the following reasons: 4 (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;

5 (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); 6 (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic) 7 misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;

8 (4) the judgment is void;

9 (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it 10 prospectively is no longer equitable; or

11 (6) any other reason that justifies relief. 12 Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). A motion under Rule 60(b) must be brought within a reasonable time. 13 And, for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or 14 the date of the proceeding. A Rule 60(b) motion lies within the discretion of the court. Because 15 such motions undo a final judgment, relief under Rule 60(b) is limited and granted sparingly in 16 extraordinary circumstances. See Navajo Nation v. Dep’t of the Interior, 876 F.3d 1144, 1173 17 (9th Cir. 2017). 18 Because Plaintiff asserts the Court’s order striking his Complaint was based on an error by 19 the Clerk of Court, the Court construes the motion as brought under Rule 60(b)(1). See Kemp v. 20 United States, 596 U.S. 528, 534 (2022). However, Plaintiff provides no evidence that any error 21 was made by the Clerk’s Office or this Court. He asserts that the Complaint the Court screened 22 was not his, but it bears his name, is written in his handwriting, and bears his signature. 23 Plaintiff’s Complaint did not include a “short and plain statement of the claim” but had 24 factual allegations scattered throughout the 50 pages in contravention to Rule 8. In addition to 25 violating Rule 8, Plaintiff’s Complaint also violates Rule 10(b) which requires that a complaint be 26 written in “numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of 27 circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). Plaintiff’s Complaint is written in narrative form and does 28 1 not contain numbered paragraphs setting forth its claims. See Quezada v. Hedgepeth, 2009 WL 2 529888 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2009) (dismissing under Rules 8 and 10 complaint that was “composed 3 of a lengthy factual narrative followed by two general grounds for relief that raise multiple claims 4 per count and make only vague and conclusory allegations against Defendants as a group.”) 5 Plaintiff’s Motion is devoid of any reason why the Court should reconsider its previous 6 order striking his Complaint. The Court will nevertheless direct the Clerk to provide Plaintiff 7 with a copy of the Complaint that was transferred to this Court and extend the time for Plaintiff to 8 file an amended complaint in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. 9 In filing his amended complaint, Plaintiff is advised to use the Court’s approved civil 10 rights complaint form. Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the 11 “First Amended Complaint.” The amended complaint must not exceed twenty-five (25) pages 12 and must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety legibly. The amended complaint cannot refer or 13 incorporate by reference any portion of the original complaint. Plaintiff must provide 14 information in his amended complaint regarding the Court’s jurisdiction and the defendants, and 15 he must divide his lawsuit into separate counts if he is alleging more than one cause of action. In 16 each count, Plaintiff must identify the federal constitutional civil right allegedly violated, state 17 with facts how each defendant participated in the alleged violation at issue, explain how Plaintiff 18 was injured by the alleged violation, and what relief he is seeking. 19 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 20 1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 17) is DENIED. 21 2. No later than July 28, 2024, Plaintiff shall deliver to correctional officials for 22 mailing (1) a legible amended complaint numbering no more than 25 pages and setting forth its 23 claims in numbered paragraphs or (2) a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41. The Court 24 strongly recommends Plaintiff use the attached civil rights complaint form in filing his amended 25 complaint. 26 3. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Court Order or seek an extension of 27 time to comply, the Court will recommend that the district court dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s 28 failure to comply with this Court Order and prosecute this action. 1 4. The Clerk of Court shall include a blank civil rights complaint form for □□□□□□□□□□□ 2 || use as appropriate. 3 5. The Clerk of Court is also directed to provide Plaintiff with a one-time courtesy 4 | copy of his Complaint. (Doc. No. 1). 5 ° | Dated: _ June 7, 2024 lew □□ fareh Zacks 7 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Wilson v. Castro, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC) Wilson v. Castro ((PC) Wilson v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Navajo Nation v. Department of the Interior
876 F.3d 1144 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Kemp v. United States
596 U.S. 528 (Supreme Court, 2022)