(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
PRESTON TAYLOR, No. 1:20-cv-00798-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (ECF No. 127) REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of the action with prejudice with each party bearing its own litigation costs and attorneys’ fees.1 (ECF No. 127.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. /// /// 1 The Court notes that on December 22, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs (ECF No. 116) in the amount of $8,728.15 pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement. (ECF No. 126.) Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□□□ IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee Dated: _ December 29, 2023
‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ((PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.