(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 25, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00798·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 PRESTON TAYLOR, Case No. 1:20-cv-00798-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 37) 14 P. TURNER, 15 Defendant.

16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action is likely to involve production of 19 confidential or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 20 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 21 Plaintiff Preston Taylor and Defendant P. Turner stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 22 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 23 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 24 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled 25 to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, 26 as set forth in Section 12.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 27 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must 1 be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court 2 to file material under seal. 3 2. DEFINITIONS 4 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 5 information or items under this Order. 6 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 7 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal 8 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 9 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” Information or Items: 10 information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that a 11 Party has designated in good faith to be confidential and for attorneys’ eyes only. The criteria 12 for such designation shall be whether the Party has a good-faith belief that the information is 13 entitled to protection from disclosure to non-attorneys, because such information threatens the 14 safety of individuals or inmates, or threatens the safety and security of a prison. “Attorneys” 15 shall be limited to the counsel of record in this case, their support staff, and Expert(s). 16 2.4 Counsel (without qualified): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 17 as their support staff). 18 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 19 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 20 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” 21 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 22 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 23 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 24 responses to discovery in this matter. 25 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 26 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 27 a consultant in this action. 1 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 2 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel or Record or any other outside counsel. 3 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 4 entity not named as a Party to this action. 5 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this action 6 but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this action and have appeared in this action on 7 behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party. 8 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 9 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 10 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 11 Material in this action. 12 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 13 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 14 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 15 subcontractors. 16 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 18 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 19 Producing Party. 20 3. SCOPE 21 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 22 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; 23 (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 24 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal 25 Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not 26 cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of 27 disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to 1 becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known 2 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the 3 disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of 4 confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be 5 governed by a separate agreement or order. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 8 this Stipulation and Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in 9 writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of 10 (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final 11 judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, 12 or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for 13 extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 14 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 15 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 16 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take 17 care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 18 standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, 19 documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify—so that other portions of the 20 material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not 21 swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 22 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 23 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 24 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 25 expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 26 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 27 for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all 1 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ((PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)