(PC) Reyna v. Kings County Jail

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: January 29, 2025
• Docket: 1:20-cv-00447
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN REYNA, No. 1:20-cv-00447 KES GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION IN DUCES TECUM” 13 v. (ECF No. 65) 14 KINGS COUNTY JAIL, et al., ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO 15 Defendants. INFORM THE COURT REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ABILITY TO ACCESS 16 MONEYS IN HIS TRUST ACCOURT AND HIS ABILITY TO OBTAIN MONEY 17 ORDERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING WITNESS AND WITNESS TRAVEL FEES 18 DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO THIS 19 ORDER DUE IN FIVE DAYS 20 21 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 22 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 23 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This matter is at the 24 pretrial phase of proceedings. See ECF No. 51. Plaintiff is in the process of attempting to secure 25 the attendance of his trial witnesses. 26 Plaintiff has filed a “Motion in Duces Tecum to: Subpoena Kings County Jail to Release 27 Funds.” ECF No. 65. It appears that Plaintiff is requesting the Court to direct the Kings County 28 Jail to release funds to the Court from his trust account in an amount calculated by the Court as 1 being necessary to pay the witness fees and travel expenses of his trial witnesses as he alleges that 2 the Jail will not assist him in procuring money orders for that purpose. 3 Defendants will be directed therefor, as set forth below, to inform Court regarding this 4 matter. 5 I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 6 Plaintiff states that he has asked Kings County Jail deputies how to go about 7 releasing funds from his trust account to obtain the necessary money orders. ECF No. 65 at 1. 8 He further states that since making these inquiries, he has been told by “Deputy James” that 9 “there is no policy that states that [Kings County Jail has] to do anything to help [him] with 10 [obtaining] anything that has to do with getting money orders for any case.” Id. (brackets added). 11 Finally, Plaintiff states that the deputies at Kings County Jail are aware that he is 12 proceeding pro se in this case and that he has limited resources. He therefor requests the Court to 13 direct Kings County Jail to release the necessary funds to the Court so that he can pay the witness 14 and travel fees for his witnesses. ECF No. 65 at 1-2. 15 II. DISCUSSION 16 To begin, an inmate has a constitutionally protected right of meaningful access to the 17 courts. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 820-21, 97 S. Ct. 1491, 52 L. Ed. 2d 72 (1977). 18 To determine if this right is being afforded to Plaintiff, and to assist the Court with a 19 prompt resolution of this matter, Defendants will be directed to respond to the Court by filing 20 with the Court answers to the following questions, and to do so within 5 days of receiving this 21 order: (1) whether Plaintiff is being hindered or denied access to the funds in his trust account, if 22 so, why; (2) whether Plaintiff is being denied or hindered the ability to obtain money orders 23 needed by him to obtain witnesses for his upcoming trial, if so, why; (3) whether the Kings 24 County Jail has an existing policy or protocol regarding requests made by inmates whom wish to 25 procure money orders that are necessary to pay witness fees; (4) if there is such a policy or 26 protocol, what is the policy or protocol; and finally, (4) if no such policy or protocol exists, how 27 is the Kings County Jail abiding by the Bounds decision when inmates are seeking its assistance 28 in obtaining the attendance of their trial witnesses? 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 Within five days from the date of this order, Defendants shall file with the Court 3 answers to the questions set forth above. 4 5 Defendants are warned that failure to comply with this order within the time allotted 6 may result in the imposition of sanctions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1927. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9

10 Dated: January 28, 2025 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28