(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento
This text of (PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento ((PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES LEE MATHEWS, No. 2:23-cv-1021 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se,1 has filed a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $52.00 19 administrative fee nor has he filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 20 1914(a) & 1915(a). Plaintiff will be granted thirty days to pay the filing fee in full or submit a 21 properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 22 1 The complaint states that plaintiff’s claims arose during his incarceration at the Sacramento 23 County Main Jail and Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Records indicate that plaintiff is no longer an inmate in the custody of Sacramento County or the California 24 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). See https://www.sacsheriff.com/InmateInformation/SearchNames.aspx (inmate locator website 25 operated by the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department); http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov (inmate locator website operated by CDCR). This court may take judicial notice of such 26 information. See Louis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp., 460 F. Supp. 2d 1153, 1155 fn.4 (C.D. Cal. 2006) (court may take judicial notice of state agency records); Pacheco v. Diaz, 27 No. 1:19-cv-0774 SAB (PC), 2019 WL 5073594, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2019) (court may take judicial notice of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's inmate locator 28 system). 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, either the $350.00 3 | filing fee plus the $52.00 administrative fee or a properly completed application to proceed in 4 | forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply 5 | with this order or seek an extension of time to do so will result in dismissal of this action without 6 || prejudice; and 7 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma 8 | Pauperis for use in a civil rights action. 9 | Dated: November 6, 2023 10 11 D ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 DB:15 16 | DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/math1021.3a.dad 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-mathews-v-county-of-sacramento-caed-2023.