(PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 17, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-01697·Unknown

Opinion

WILLIAM J. JONES, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01697-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 28) Defendants.

Plaintiff William J. Jones is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 14, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss this action because Plaintiff fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Doc. 28.) Plaintiff filed objections on December 5, 2019. (Doc. 29.) In his objections, Plaintiff states that his complaints state cognizable claims and thus should be allowed to proceed. (Id. at 2.). However, Plaintiff does not address the substance of the findings, which provide that Plaintiff’s complaints are filled with conclusory statements and do not allege sufficient facts to state a claim that is plausible on its face. (Doc. 28 at 4-5.) See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Because Plaintiff has received three prior opportunities to amend, the Court finds that further opportunity would be futile. See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212-13 (9th Cir. 2012). In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 14, 2019, (Doc. 28), are ADOPTED in full; 2. This action is DISMISSED; and, 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 17, 2019 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

(PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II ((PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Javiad Akhtar v. J. Mesa
698 F.3d 1202 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)