(PC) Hernandez v. Barajas

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 16, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00480·Unknown

Opinion

JUAN HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00408-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER OF CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION v. JOHN DOE #1-#4, Defendants. Before the court is plaintiff Juan Hernandez’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed on March 15, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). According to the complaint, the events giving rise to the cause of action occurred while plaintiff was incarcerated at the Mule Creek State Prison in Ione, California. Ione is a city located in Amador County, which is within the venue of the Sacramento Division of United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See E.D. Ca. Local Rule 120(d). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), “a district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” Id. (emphasis added). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, venue is proper where defendants reside, or where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b); Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 474 (9th Cir. 1995) (reviewing federal court jurisdiction and venue in a § 1983 action). Because the incidents giving rise to plaintiff's claim occurred in Amador County, the Court finds it is in the interests of justice to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Local Rule 120(f) to the Sacramento Division. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 3. As aresult of the transfer, this Court declines to rule on plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2). IT ISSO ORDERED. Dated: March 16, 2021 Milne. □□ fares Zaskth HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Hernandez v. Barajas, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Hernandez v. Barajas ((PC) Hernandez v. Barajas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ziegler v. Indian River County
64 F.3d 470 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)